Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rules on Third-Party Benefits in Finance

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has ruled that financial institutions are not obliged to pass on third-party benefits received in 'execution-only' relationships with clients.

Discretionary vs. Execution-Only Relationships

The court distinguished between discretionary investment management relationships, where institutions make independent investment decisions, and execution-only relationships, where clients make their own investment choices. In discretionary relationships, institutions must pass on third-party benefits unless a valid waiver exists. In execution-only relationships, this obligation does not apply.

Conflict of Interest Considerations

The ruling emphasizes that the duty to return third-party benefits depends on the potential for conflicts of interest. In execution-only relationships, where clients control investment decisions, the risk of such conflicts is deemed minimal.

This decision provides clarity for financial institutions and clients regarding the handling of third-party benefits in different types of investment relationships.

Este sitio web utiliza cookies. Las cookies esenciales y funcionales son necesarias para el correcto funcionamiento del sitio y no pueden ser rechazadas. Lea nuestra política de cookies para obtener más información.
JUSTICEFACE Ai
JUSTICEFACE Ai
Abogado profesional con IA