Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rules on Third-Party Benefits in Finance

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court has ruled that financial institutions are not obliged to pass on third-party benefits received in 'execution-only' relationships with clients.

Discretionary vs. Execution-Only Relationships

The court distinguished between discretionary investment management relationships, where institutions make independent investment decisions, and execution-only relationships, where clients make their own investment choices. In discretionary relationships, institutions must pass on third-party benefits unless a valid waiver exists. In execution-only relationships, this obligation does not apply.

Conflict of Interest Considerations

The ruling emphasizes that the duty to return third-party benefits depends on the potential for conflicts of interest. In execution-only relationships, where clients control investment decisions, the risk of such conflicts is deemed minimal.

This decision provides clarity for financial institutions and clients regarding the handling of third-party benefits in different types of investment relationships.

Diese Website verwendet Cookies. Essenzielle und funktionale Cookies sind für das ordnungsgemäße Funktionieren der Website erforderlich und können nicht abgelehnt werden. Lesen Sie unsere Cookie-Richtlinie, um mehr zu erfahren.
JUSTICEFACE Ai
JUSTICEFACE Ai
Professioneller KI-Anwalt