Luxembourg
On 19 December 2025, Luxembourg enacted a landmark law introducing sweeping changes to its anti-money laundering (AML) and criminal procedure framework. This reform aims to accelerate criminal proceedings, strengthen the fight against money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation, and ensure compliance with international standards ahead of the June 2026 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) deadline.
The reform overhauls Article 506‑1 of the Luxembourg Criminal Code, expanding the money laundering offense to encompass any crime or misdemeanor as a predicate offense. This replaces the previous enumerated list approach, allowing authorities to address a broader range of criminal activities.
The law enhances prosecutorial powers by allowing multiple investigative acts without opening a full investigation and removes the three-month interval between requests. The scope now includes a broader range of economic and probity offenses, facilitating more efficient prosecution of complex financial crimes.
The reform modernizes procedures to reduce procedural impasses. Legal entities failing to appear despite a summons can now be indicted based on a nonappearance report, and individuals subject to an arrest warrant who cannot be apprehended can still be indicted, allowing cases to advance despite absences.
The amendment narrows the obligation to provide special reasons for denying a suspension for prison sentences of less than two years, except in cases of legal recidivism. This change aims to correct the misconception of a quasi-automatic suspension for first-time offenders while preserving the court's ability to individualize sanctions.
The expanded concept of predicate offenses and inclusion of material benefits significantly widen the scope of money laundering offenses to conduct not traditionally associated with laundering scenarios. This development requires careful legal analyses to determine the boundaries of application and ensure compliance.
Professionals must update their risk assessment practices to reflect the "all-offenses" approach. Suspicion may now arise from any activity suggesting involvement in criminal conduct, necessitating recalibration of transaction-monitoring systems and enhanced training for staff to recognize a wider range of red flags.
For more detailed information, refer to the original article: Luxembourg: Major Reform of the AML Framework