Two Individuals Sentenced for Engine Oil Attack on MDP Activist Mandhy
On August 28, 2026, the Criminal Court of the Maldives sentenced two individuals, Ahmed Rishmah and Ahmed Raiham Naeem, for their involvement in an engine oil attack on Mariyam 'Mandhy' Zubair, an activist affiliated with the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP). The incident occurred on March 17, 2025, near Woodberry Restaurant in Malé, as Mandhy was returning home on her motorcycle after participating in a series of MDP protests.
Details of the Incident
Mandhy, the mother of South Galolhu MP Meekail Naseem, was targeted with black oil while riding her motorcycle. The attack was perceived as an act of intimidation against political activists. Following the incident, the Maldives Police Service conducted an investigation that led to the arrest of Rishmah and Raiham.
Legal Proceedings and Sentencing
The state brought two charges against both individuals: aiding and abetting in property damage and aiding and abetting in battery. During the trial, both defendants pleaded guilty to the charges. The court's sentencing was as follows:
- Ahmed Rishmah: Initially sentenced to one month and six days for aiding and abetting in property damage. After deducting time served in pre-trial detention, his remaining sentence was reduced to 20 days. Additionally, he received an 18-day sentence for aiding and abetting in battery, resulting in a total remaining prison term of 38 days.
- Ahmed Raiham Naeem: Sentenced to 27 days for property damage and 13 days for battery, totaling 40 days in prison.
Background of the Defendants
Official records indicate that Ahmed Rishmah has a prior arrest record related to a drug-related offense. Ahmed Raiham was previously arrested in connection with a robbery at Velana International Airport, during which a substantial amount of cash was stolen from Bank of Maldives employees.
Implications and Reactions
The sentencing of Rishmah and Raiham underscores the Maldivian judiciary's commitment to addressing politically motivated attacks and ensuring the safety of activists. The MDP and human rights organizations have welcomed the verdict, viewing it as a step toward upholding democratic principles and protecting freedom of expression.
However, some critics argue that the sentences are relatively lenient given the nature of the attack and its potential chilling effect on political activism. They call for more stringent measures to deter such acts in the future.
Conclusion
The case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by political activists in the Maldives and the importance of a robust legal framework to protect individuals from politically motivated violence. The judiciary's role in enforcing the rule of law remains crucial in maintaining the country's democratic integrity.
